Comment on We Still Don’t Know the Second Circuit’s Position on Embedding and Copyright Infringement–Richardson v. Townsquare by Charles Barton

In reply to AOD LIcensing.

I was not using relay in a specific situation of common carriage of a message (California) or of intelligence (Massachusetts). A relay could be used in a situation of private carriage.

The YouTube embedding HTML would be something like the following:

a%20href=

The iframe HTML directive is a lot like the a href= directive. When the latter is clicked, the browser goes to the specified webpage. When the former directive is clicked, the browser creates a frame in the current webpage and puts the destination webpage in the frame. I don't see how there is any difference in the monetization of the YouTube video for the YouTube account holder.

Ask ChatGPT: "What does the HTML iframe directive do?" ChatGPT will explain.

添加评论
点赞收藏
点踩分享查看原文
评论
?
参与讨论