How are you guys going about creating plans with Sol 6?

I’m used to using the "superpowers" approach with writing plans. But when I use GPT-6 Sol, it simply generates a summary of the plan. It performs a bit better after the third or fourth prompt specifying that the plan is to be executed by a Luna sub-agent. I review it with Opus 5.5, and it improves by about 60%. It’s acting really strangely when it comes to creating plans—at least for me. You're right. The previous plan left it up to the person executing it to figure out the solution. I rewrote [Plan XXXXX] to include references to the source, signature, and preflight logic, a table of all affected gestures, the exact rollback sequence, and tests with verifiable results. Yes. The plan still leaves the core logic in prose, despite the section on interfaces. I will add C++ blocks for the Save predicate, migration, collection, and map writing, as well as the call points and test assertions. It remains a plan; the plugin itself is not being edited.