Are atoms and galaxies the same dynamical object defining the scale transition boundary of a fractal? Dark Matter in electron orbit shape as evidence? [closed]

Inspired by the exact morphology match for the Fermi bubbles and the H 3d_z^2 orbital, I ran the calculations with Rust+CUDA: using scaled Hydrogenic orbitals as the distribution for galactic dark matter generated a better rotation curve fit to the Milky-Way than all the major standard models for DM, and avoids the core-cusp problem and explains the missing satellites problem.

The observational data for the Black Hole shadow of Sag-A* is best fit with Extremal-Black Hole parameters. Using string theory calculations with that observational data, the standard 3-state Black hole has Floor[ln(Discrete Quantum Entropy State Count)] = 137.

An Extremal black hole has a Anti-de Sitter throat with its singularity pushed out to infinity, but if it intersects with another black hole, it makes an Einstein-Rosen bridge. Will the correct Quantum gravity model show the singularity gets mollified in such a way that the bridge would be transferring energy? So stars falling in at the equator of the cores of galaxies would spit out the polar jets of another. Could this be evidence of the photonic mechanism in the General Relativity model? A quantized crossing condition at the cores of black holes which many mainstream physics models now imply would explain how that energy is quantized, and the collapse of the event horizon boundaries to null spacetime intervals would explain how it prevents the grandfather paradox.

Next I will check if AGN Jets vs No Jets implies collapsed vs superposition of hydrogenic orbitals for the rotation curves in SPARC data. What other evidence would be required to show that Atoms and Galaxies are congruent dynamical objects that arise from the same fundamental law of physics?