Investing - Theory, News & General • Re: "TIPS: Safer Than They Seem"
'%20fill-opacity='.8'%20d='M3.256%203.913a3.083%203.083%200%200%200-.003%204.397L8%2012.998l4.743-4.684a3.085%203.085%200%200%200%20.001-4.4c-.6-.593-1.4-.914-2.233-.914a3.17%203.17%200%200%200-1.91.635L8%204.087l-.601-.452A3.17%203.17%200%200%200%205.489%203c-.834%200-1.634.321-2.233.913m10.19%205.111-4.748%204.69a.996.996%200%200%201-1.397%200L2.549%209.02a4.083%204.083%200%200%201%20.004-5.82A4.17%204.17%200%200%201%205.488%202c.907%200%201.787.29%202.512.835A4.17%204.17%200%200%201%2010.51%202c1.093%200%202.146.422%202.936%201.202a4.085%204.085%200%200%201%200%205.822'%20/%3e%3c/svg%3e)
'%20stroke-opacity='.75'%20stroke-width='1.5'%20stroke-linejoin='round'/%3e%3c/svg%3e)
TIPSWatch has tracked how 10year TIPS vs Nominals have compared at maturity. The only real downside to TIPS is the poorer liquidity with wider spreads, especially during stressed markets, than nominal treasuries.
https://tipswatch.com/tips-vs-nominal-treasurys/
Statistics: Posted by SpaceCowboy — Mon Oct 26, 2026 11:47 pm
参与讨论