Dangers or benefits of being 100% self taught

I'm a mid-career technology manager who's a genuine domain expert in a few narrow hardware fields, with decades of field, operations and leadership experience, but almost zero real coding ability. The coding end of my projects has always been a bit of a black box and I was always on the outside waiting for the magic juice to get injected into my integrated hardware. I've been a bleeding edge technology adopter for 35 years, which included tinkering with various chat bots and similar tech over the decades, but jumped into LLMs with both feet starting around the GPT 3.0 era, first as an interesting examination of the state of the technology and evolving into crude problem solving and eventually maturing into a progressively more efficient and effective coding tool to just build my way out of problems and automate annoying personal workflows. Over the last year this has gotten serious and I've developed a series of tools used by many employees that solve various problems, automate tedious and error prone work and genuinely changed what we can accomplish on any given day. I've returned hours back to employees who are finding new and interesting projects they now have time to tackle. Our accounting has never been more accurate and smooth, schedules are better aligned to the work and the benefits have lead to good will from both the users and leadership. I use my home lab to push boundaries and break things, making incredible leaps with what I can do with my home server and automations that save time, money and improve quality of life of me and my family. When skills are honed and mature they are brought into the workplace and the benefits are felt there as well. I am trying to figure out where on the Dunning-Kreuger curve I am. I constantly joke that I'm a dangerous idiot, but I spend a huge portion of my time fussing about security, efficiency and documentation. I do large adversarial reviews of my repos between models, run things by institutional governance bodies and generally am doing my best not to turn my self deprecating joke into a reality. That said, these days I read zero lines of code (as if it would even help if I did). I'm skilled, specific and well grounded with my prompts, have a good grasp on what models are good at what tasks, know when and why to adjust thinking levels, but claude spits it out, I run it and if it works it goes in the pot. I approve almost every request that slips past the auto approve gate. I run every elevated powershell script it asks of me almost without consideration. I am very cautious with keys/secrets (having been burned once at home by being sloppy) and everything I create can run from a thumb drive or an HTML file if it's intended for mobile, with essentially nothing ever installed on any device. I watch zero training videos, subscribe to no blogs, read no articles that discuss strategy or tactics and generally only lurk on subs like this just to take the general temperature of the industry. Nearly 100% of what I've learned has been just tinkering and I can't seem to stomach any of the formalized educational content or even informal influencer channels. I just want to be diving in and throwing switches and turning dials to see what happens. This fits my learning style that has served me well across my career. So... am I a dangerous outlier, or is this a common archetype?