Astra as planning + Opus 5.5 implementation and interpretation = cracked workflow

Something worth while to talk about from the sea of complaints. I had a very good experience using Astra as the planner and mapping out my ideas whenever I am away from my work computer. Currently working on my own game to try this out, but Opus 5.5 at medium manages to implement even the most complicated tasks if Astra is the one mapping out and planning out how to execute it. I find it to have better output if Astra was the one making markdown files about implementations than to just prompting it directly. Saves a lot of tokens too if Opus didn't have to think much on how to execute it (and a lot of human brain thinking). Currently however, Astra felt weaker to the point that it's a downgrade when it's the one coding, but when it comes to everything else (planning, researching and finding holes in code) it still does a good job. Just Astra light itself for mapping out implementation plans, medium if it's too complicated, then Opus medium or high when it comes to implementing it.

添加评论
点赞收藏
点踩分享查看原文
评论
?
参与讨论