Missing decay at BESIII points to long-sought glueball
Physicists at China’s BESIII experiment in Beijing have found the strongest evidence yet for the existence of glueballs – subatomic particles made of gluons alone. The glueball-like particle is called X(2370) and it was first spotted at BESIII 15 years ago.
Gluons carry the strong nuclear force that binds quarks into protons and neutrons. Gluons also pull on each other as hard as they pull on quarks, which means they ought to be able to clump into particles called glueballs.
“So far, all ordinary matter that we know of is composed of quarks and leptons,” says Colin Morningstar of Carnegie Mellon University, whose 1990s supercomputer simulations helped predict what glueballs should look like. “A glueball is a totally new form of matter made up entirely of gluons – no quarks, no leptons,” explains US-based Morningstar, who is not a member of the BESIII team.
For four decades, detecting glueballs have been an important goal of BESIII and its predecessor – according to Shan Jin of China’s Nanjing University. BESIII is on the BEPCII accelerator, where electrons collide with positrons to create large numbers of J/ψ particles. A J/ψ can sometimes decay by shedding a flash of light and dumping the rest of its energy into gluons. The gluons could then bunch together to create a glueball.
Lightest glueball
In 2011, Yanping Huang was Jin’s PhD student and observed the production of the short-lived X(2370) particle at BESIII. “The most important next step was to determine its spin-parity quantum numbers, and it turned out to be one of the most difficult steps for us due to large background processes,” says Huang, now at China’s Institute of High Energy Physics in Beijing. Those numbers describe how a particle behaves when turned around and seen in a mirror – a kind of fingerprint. Only in 2024, with an exceptionally clean chain of decays and all 10 billion J/ψ particles, could the team read it, and it matched the prediction for the lightest glueball.
Now, Huang, Jin and the rest of the BESIII team have gone further and searched in vain for a specific X(2370) decay channel. They argue its absence suggests that X(2370) contains no quarks and the lightest glueball is its dominant constituent.
Quarks come in several types, or flavours, and a glueball contains none, so it cannot favour one flavour over another. That even-handedness forbids the X(2370) from breaking up into a particular pair of kaons, which are lightweight particles carrying a strange quark. BESIII looked for that break-up and found that the decay occurs at a rate that is at most 8% of the rate of a much more common X(2370) decay channel.
Huang explains that an ordinary quark-based particle should undergo the kaon-pair decay far more often. “The lightest glueball is essential for a natural and complete explanation of all these properties, while all other interpretations can hardly explain them simultaneously”.
Like a duck
Francesco Giacosa at Jan Kochanowski University in Poland is enthusiastic about the BESIII research, which he was not involved with. “We have an object, X(2370), that walks like a duck, quacks like a duck and, in addition, does not do something that the duck we are searching for should not do.”
Jin says that the BESIII result has important implications. “This is the direct proof of self-coupling among gluons predicted by QCD about 50 years ago,” where QCD is quantum chromodynamics, the theory of the strong force. It also illuminates the origin of mass, “since the gluon mass is zero and the glueball mass is totally from the strong interaction”. Glueballs, he says, are “a unique kind of matter made of pure force”.
Morningstar observes, “The results are the strongest evidence yet that particles dominated by a glueball component can exist in nature. This work is certainly an experimental triumph.”
Not everyone is ready to call the 50-year search over. “In my opinion, an independent experimental confirmation would be extremely important,” says Giacosa. A glueball can also blend with ordinary quark particles, he notes, so “even if X(2370) is predominantly a glueball, we do not know precisely how large its non-glueball component is”.
Upgrade needed
Gentler collisions elsewhere could shed further light on this, says Jin, “but it seems difficult for them to collect 10 billion J/ψ events to perform systematic studies as BESIII in a short time, unless we upgrade BEPCII itself again”.
That upgrade is on the collaboration’s wish list. Huang plans further measurements of the particle’s properties, which “will also certainly help us to identify more glueballs”. Reaching them may take ten times more data.
Morningstar also looks forward to further discoveries, “Our theoretical computations have suggested other glueballs that might exist, so with this successful study, I believe the search for other glueballs will intensify”.
Giacosa thinks the prize is worth it. “Glueballs are, in my view, among the most fascinating composite objects predicted within the Standard Model,” he says, meaning physicists’ theory of the fundamental particles and forces. “Establishing one experimentally would be much more than adding one more particle to the list – it would confirm one of the most remarkable predictions of the theory of the strong interaction.”
The results were presented in August at the International Conference on High Energy Physics and are described in a preprint on arXiv.
The post appeared first on Physics World.