Fidelity in Quantum Computing: The Nines That Decide Q-Day

Fidelity in Quantum Computing: The Nines That Decide Q-Day 图片 1
Fidelity in Quantum Computing: The Nines That Decide Q-Day 图片 2

Table of Contents

Introduction

In June 2025, physicists at the University of Oxford ran randomized benchmarking on a single trapped calcium ion and measured an average error per Clifford gate of $1.5\times10^{-7}$. One mistake in 6.7 million operations. The qubit ran on microwave pulses from a chip-integrated resonator, at room temperature, without magnetic shielding, and it held its quantum state for about 70 seconds at a stretch. I covered the result when it was published in Physical Review Letters as the most accurate qubit operation ever recorded, and a year later it still is.

Five months after Oxford, Quantinuum launched Helios, a commercial 98-qubit trapped-ion machine whose two-qubit gates fail about once every 1,270 attempts, an average infidelity of $7.9\times10^{-4}$, taken over all of the machine’s operational zones, later confirmed in a peer-reviewed Nature paper. That is also a record: the best two-qubit performance any full processor has ever shipped with. Put the two records side by side and you get the picture that actually describes quantum computing in mid-2026. Single-qubit control is close to a solved problem. The two-qubit problem is the entire game—and it sits nearly…

添加评论
点赞收藏
点踩分享查看原文
评论
?
参与讨论