The LLM Experience of BoreDOM

TL;DR I talk about the changes made to bring LLM Experience design to boreDOM , my testbed zero-build JS runtime that collapses HTML, CSS, JS and state into a single HTML file so models can locate the source of an effect in place. What does a codebase look like if its primary author is a machine? If a codebase is mostly written by a machine, do our usual frontend instincts still hold? What do we need to change to make that workflow reliable? And how much can we min-max an LLM’s strengths if we stop designing exclusively for human cognition? I walked this path, looking for answers, adapting and changing boreDOM a minimal JS framework (with no bundler or package manager) I keep evolving as I learn where LLM workflows actually break. With little JS boreDOM tries to make components reusable…