In Partial, Pugnacious Defense of Functional Decision Theory

I wrote a (partial) defense of FDT responding to Bentham's Bulldug. What it lacks in philosophical rigor or clear thinking it makes up for cheap jokes and potty-mouthed bellicosity. It also contains the first decision-theoretical arguement that the correct action in Newcomb's Problem is to turn into a leprechaun and vomit a string of gold coins.

Discuss