Claude's writing style has me on edge

I was enjoying Benn Stancil’s latest column1 on generalized vs specialized models (his typical, punchy, link-ridden screed) until this paragraph jump scared me:

And that’s the turn nobody priced in. Here’s what the spectrum hides: The real axis was never general-versus-specialized—it was unmonetized-versus-monetized. We called Claude general-purpose because it could be a boyfriend, an essayist, a coworker—because it could be whatever we happened to need. That’s not a property of the software. That’s a property of our wanting. The spectrum isn’t widening. It’s collapsing. The line between the two categories isn’t a line. It’s a clock. Read that last paragraph again and you’ll see it’s a eulogy.